Cop Killer
1st October 2004, 08:35 PM
First of all: sorry for the excessively long delay. You see,
as I said two years ago to the one who is not the son of a goat
(read: Rob Kelk), I have things more important to do with my time than
staying connected to the imbecile sides of the Internet 24X7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Chika (miyuki@spam-no-way.invalid)
Subject: Re: Wallpapers/
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.arts.anime.misc
Date: 2004-01-02 07:05:23 PST
In article <10e60fcf.0401020416.2790ecac@posting.google.com>,
2501 <ksm_2501zx@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Chika <miyuki@spam.no.way> wrote in message news:<4c6904413emiyuki@no.spam.here>...
> > In article <10e60fcf.0312300754.33ad9188@posting.google.com>, 2501
> > <ksm_2501zx@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > > > And yes, I was aware of your identity.
> > > Thank you, sincerely. Chika was not, apparently.
> > Hmm... looks like you might be a little confused.
> Of course not.
Then why tell me that "Chika was not", then? You spoke of me *to me* in
the third person, which seems odd, to say the least.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
So speaks one of the many ones who systematically use the 3rd person
of the singular for referring to themselves... (*SHAKES HEAD*)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > How can I be confused,
> > and not?
> In the past you *were* confused, and currently you *are not*.
> Simple desu ne.
> Remember, it was you who wrote:
> <QUOTE>
> Sort your HTML skills out, guy!
> </QUOTE>
I remember well. That isn't why I said that you were possibly confused.
> And as I said before, I am NOT the person to whom you should be giving
> that order. Besides, David Pascal does NOT surf on the Usenet ---
> probably because its excessive quantity of garbage just scared him.
I know. That was why I said "I was aware of your identity".
> > Might be worth quickly reviewing the attributions on each post.
> >
> > I might have confused a reader by responding in the tense that I did...
> Tweaking a bit, it was not "in the ~tense~ that you did".
> You'd better brush up your grammar... ;-)
That would be difficult! She's in her grave... whoops! Tasteless jokes r
me!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Anyway, you "forgot" to say !APOLOGIES! for having posted an offensively-
-redundant reply to the anterior message from me. But unitedstatians are
incurably arrogant, ne? And that is a good thing only because they were
born in the u.s.a., "of course". Pffft...
////////////////////////////////////////
as I said two years ago to the one who is not the son of a goat
(read: Rob Kelk), I have things more important to do with my time than
staying connected to the imbecile sides of the Internet 24X7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From: Chika (miyuki@spam-no-way.invalid)
Subject: Re: Wallpapers/
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.arts.anime.misc
Date: 2004-01-02 07:05:23 PST
In article <10e60fcf.0401020416.2790ecac@posting.google.com>,
2501 <ksm_2501zx@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> Chika <miyuki@spam.no.way> wrote in message news:<4c6904413emiyuki@no.spam.here>...
> > In article <10e60fcf.0312300754.33ad9188@posting.google.com>, 2501
> > <ksm_2501zx@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > > > And yes, I was aware of your identity.
> > > Thank you, sincerely. Chika was not, apparently.
> > Hmm... looks like you might be a little confused.
> Of course not.
Then why tell me that "Chika was not", then? You spoke of me *to me* in
the third person, which seems odd, to say the least.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
So speaks one of the many ones who systematically use the 3rd person
of the singular for referring to themselves... (*SHAKES HEAD*)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > How can I be confused,
> > and not?
> In the past you *were* confused, and currently you *are not*.
> Simple desu ne.
> Remember, it was you who wrote:
> <QUOTE>
> Sort your HTML skills out, guy!
> </QUOTE>
I remember well. That isn't why I said that you were possibly confused.
> And as I said before, I am NOT the person to whom you should be giving
> that order. Besides, David Pascal does NOT surf on the Usenet ---
> probably because its excessive quantity of garbage just scared him.
I know. That was why I said "I was aware of your identity".
> > Might be worth quickly reviewing the attributions on each post.
> >
> > I might have confused a reader by responding in the tense that I did...
> Tweaking a bit, it was not "in the ~tense~ that you did".
> You'd better brush up your grammar... ;-)
That would be difficult! She's in her grave... whoops! Tasteless jokes r
me!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Anyway, you "forgot" to say !APOLOGIES! for having posted an offensively-
-redundant reply to the anterior message from me. But unitedstatians are
incurably arrogant, ne? And that is a good thing only because they were
born in the u.s.a., "of course". Pffft...
////////////////////////////////////////