Syria Stingray
30th December 2002, 02:24 PM
From Syria Stingray Mon Dec 30 12:51:46 2002
Received: from [200.204.154.203] by web14705.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:51:46 GMT
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Syria Stingray" <syriastingray@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [FFML] Re: [FanFic][SMJ][v.2.0]"What Are Saber
Marionettes Made Of?"
To: "Red Death" <reddeath@lvcm.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021228182543.00a60e90@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 2410
>>> --- Red Death <reddeath@lvcm.com> wrote:
> My point, before you started going
> off on an irrelevant tangent,
IRRELEVANT? *WHY* "IRRELEVANT"?
> was that
> some people don't WANT to read lemons.
> Proper tags are not a form of "censorship." They're used to categorize the
> fic.
And I and some other authors DO NOT like to read
drool, drivel, water-plus-sugar stuff. What about at least
recommending the anific authors to use this new type of tags
as well? It is quite obvious that *deep inside* you are acting like
a mere(and *ridiculous*) "allmighty" _saviour of the bourgeois
system_.
Some ppl want to preserve the integrity of their useless and
anachronous stupid 19th-century morality;
I and other intelligent authors would appreciate very much to see our
very precious INTELLIGENCE duly respected.
> Tags like [Dark] or [Lemon] or [Barneybashing] let the reader know
> what they can expect, and if it's not their cup of tea they can pass on
> it. It's just common courtesy.
COLLECTIVE *psychopathology* does not deserve any kind of
courtesy, period.
> <bypasses anti-America / anti-Europe rant>
>
> Look, this topic has no place on the list. If you want to argue about it,
> feel free. But keep it private, and not post private emails like the one I
> sent you to the list, 'k?
And no, I do not want to read your eventual replies to this
message. Your e-mail address has been blocked.
See you on the day of the 3rd Impact ookee?
Sayounara!
ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW
**********************
>
> >Hi there again. Many many thanks for the input.
> >
> > >>> --- Red Death <reddeath@lvcm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is better. You fixed your formatting problem nicely.
> >As I said before, the formatting problem was *not* mine.
> >As you yourself have just stated, the problem belongs to the
> >FFML server, or to their mailing robot, or to both --- not to me.
> >BTW, Listar/Ecartis appears not to accept subscription requests
> >from e-mail adddies that contain the character underscore
> >(the "_") --- e.g., abc_xyz@somewhere.org.
> > And RAAC's server *was* configured to regard a line
> >that contained a period(".") only as an end-of-message mark.
> >Before I warned Brian Edmonds about that *configuration flaw*,
> >I had two fics "duly" screwed up.
> > > The problem was that your line lengths were longer than the FFML usually
> > > uses in its posts, approximately 70 characters per line. This is much
> > > better. Excellent job.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, you still have not labelled the fic correctly. In the
> > > future, remember to put [lemon] in the subject line of any fic you post
> > > which contains explicit sexual content. [Lime] is recommended for fics
> > with
> > > of suggestive or not-quite-lemony subject matter, but the [lime] tag
> isn't
> > > really a requirement as the [lemon] tag is. Without the proper tags,
> > > someone who may find explicit content offensive might open your fic and
> > > receive a bit of a shock.
> > I will think it over someday, promise. For now, I must stress that
> > to "nosotros", "the rest of the world"(I am Brazilian,
> > even though my legal name, Gillian von Karmann, is
> > completely European), the American/European obsession
> > about censorship ratings, parental guidance, spoilers warning,
> > spellcheckingmania, and things
> > alike, does sound and look odd, "exotic", not to say somewhat childish,
> > narrow-minded and
> >*ridiculous*. IMNSHO, someone ought always to remind the Americans and
> >Europeans
> >that the Internet is a WorldNet, not the backyard of AmericaNet.
> >I do not see myself obligated to follow or obey whatever my 40 years
> >of age and extra-solid knowledge regard as *absurdity*,
> >EXCEPT when forced to by the power of the current LAWS
> >(or *guns*, whichever the governments find more "appropriate").
> >Put bluntly, anyone who gets themselves offended by seeing the truth
> >in its true form surely does have a serious psychological problem.
> >This is just one of the greatest bugs in the entire "modern" western
> >(pseudo-)civilization... which is a subject to be considered later...
> >and not here, certainly.
> >
> > > OK? Great! Thanks!
> >
> >You're wellcome.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >signed: me.
[eof]
Received: from [200.204.154.203] by web14705.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:51:46 GMT
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 12:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Syria Stingray" <syriastingray@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [FFML] Re: [FanFic][SMJ][v.2.0]"What Are Saber
Marionettes Made Of?"
To: "Red Death" <reddeath@lvcm.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021228182543.00a60e90@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 2410
>>> --- Red Death <reddeath@lvcm.com> wrote:
> My point, before you started going
> off on an irrelevant tangent,
IRRELEVANT? *WHY* "IRRELEVANT"?
> was that
> some people don't WANT to read lemons.
> Proper tags are not a form of "censorship." They're used to categorize the
> fic.
And I and some other authors DO NOT like to read
drool, drivel, water-plus-sugar stuff. What about at least
recommending the anific authors to use this new type of tags
as well? It is quite obvious that *deep inside* you are acting like
a mere(and *ridiculous*) "allmighty" _saviour of the bourgeois
system_.
Some ppl want to preserve the integrity of their useless and
anachronous stupid 19th-century morality;
I and other intelligent authors would appreciate very much to see our
very precious INTELLIGENCE duly respected.
> Tags like [Dark] or [Lemon] or [Barneybashing] let the reader know
> what they can expect, and if it's not their cup of tea they can pass on
> it. It's just common courtesy.
COLLECTIVE *psychopathology* does not deserve any kind of
courtesy, period.
> <bypasses anti-America / anti-Europe rant>
>
> Look, this topic has no place on the list. If you want to argue about it,
> feel free. But keep it private, and not post private emails like the one I
> sent you to the list, 'k?
And no, I do not want to read your eventual replies to this
message. Your e-mail address has been blocked.
See you on the day of the 3rd Impact ookee?
Sayounara!
ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW
**********************
>
> >Hi there again. Many many thanks for the input.
> >
> > >>> --- Red Death <reddeath@lvcm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is better. You fixed your formatting problem nicely.
> >As I said before, the formatting problem was *not* mine.
> >As you yourself have just stated, the problem belongs to the
> >FFML server, or to their mailing robot, or to both --- not to me.
> >BTW, Listar/Ecartis appears not to accept subscription requests
> >from e-mail adddies that contain the character underscore
> >(the "_") --- e.g., abc_xyz@somewhere.org.
> > And RAAC's server *was* configured to regard a line
> >that contained a period(".") only as an end-of-message mark.
> >Before I warned Brian Edmonds about that *configuration flaw*,
> >I had two fics "duly" screwed up.
> > > The problem was that your line lengths were longer than the FFML usually
> > > uses in its posts, approximately 70 characters per line. This is much
> > > better. Excellent job.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, you still have not labelled the fic correctly. In the
> > > future, remember to put [lemon] in the subject line of any fic you post
> > > which contains explicit sexual content. [Lime] is recommended for fics
> > with
> > > of suggestive or not-quite-lemony subject matter, but the [lime] tag
> isn't
> > > really a requirement as the [lemon] tag is. Without the proper tags,
> > > someone who may find explicit content offensive might open your fic and
> > > receive a bit of a shock.
> > I will think it over someday, promise. For now, I must stress that
> > to "nosotros", "the rest of the world"(I am Brazilian,
> > even though my legal name, Gillian von Karmann, is
> > completely European), the American/European obsession
> > about censorship ratings, parental guidance, spoilers warning,
> > spellcheckingmania, and things
> > alike, does sound and look odd, "exotic", not to say somewhat childish,
> > narrow-minded and
> >*ridiculous*. IMNSHO, someone ought always to remind the Americans and
> >Europeans
> >that the Internet is a WorldNet, not the backyard of AmericaNet.
> >I do not see myself obligated to follow or obey whatever my 40 years
> >of age and extra-solid knowledge regard as *absurdity*,
> >EXCEPT when forced to by the power of the current LAWS
> >(or *guns*, whichever the governments find more "appropriate").
> >Put bluntly, anyone who gets themselves offended by seeing the truth
> >in its true form surely does have a serious psychological problem.
> >This is just one of the greatest bugs in the entire "modern" western
> >(pseudo-)civilization... which is a subject to be considered later...
> >and not here, certainly.
> >
> > > OK? Great! Thanks!
> >
> >You're wellcome.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >signed: me.
[eof]